InspectAPedia ^TM

FAILURE LAWSUIT - A Defective Septic Inspection and Septic System Failure Litigation Case Study
SepticAPedia ^©

	Enter your search terms Submit search form
	Search This Website - InspectAPedia.com

This document describes a septic lawsuit: a defective septic test and bad septic inspection led to a lawsuit after property buyers discovered, 24-hours after moving in to their new home, that the septic system was not functional, having a totally blocked septic tank and a completely failed leach field. The text demonstrates how to prove that a septic inspection and dye test were improperly conducted, failing to have even a chance of protecting the client from the expensive surprise need to completely replace a septic tank and leach field. Citation of this article by reference to this website and brief quotation for the sole purpose of review are permitted. Use of this information at other websites, in books or pamphlets for sale is reserved to the author. Technical review by industry experts has been performed and is ongoing - reviewers welcomed and are listed at "References." This document is a chapter of Inspecting, Testing, & Maintaining Residential Septic Systems an online book on septic systems. © Copyright 2008 Daniel Friedman, All Rights Reserved. Information Accuracy & Bias Pledge is at below-left. Use the links at page left to navigate this document or to go to Other Website Topics. Green links at left show where you are in our document & website.

Septic Failure Lawsuit

Plaintiff's Complaint: Septic Test Was Not Properly Performed

[home inspector's name deleted] performed a septic dye test, erred by putting water in laundry sink in the basement; ran 125g water, reported system in satisfactory condition; Buyer later found no proper system installed, had to install a "trans vac" pump up mound system, for $16,000, total damages $28,000. Area reported to be known for poor drainage, making mound system reqmt likely.

Approach to Analysis of the Septic System Test Complaint

1. ASHI Standards of Practice (exclude requiring Septic test)
2. Define existing professional standards for performing visual + dye test
3. Claim basic error made: test in laundry sink - no evidence. connects to septic

Assertions Made by the Plaintiff Regarding Inadequate Performance of a Septic Loading and Dye Test - Errors of Omission and Commission

1. Common practice includes visual inspection of yard and interior and plumbing to address the pertinent questions, + dye, volume of water, reinspection for breakout. Pertinent questions include attempting to assure that drain used for test drains into the septic fields.
2. An error can be inferred if dye and loading water volume were not introduced into the proper drains. If this is the case, whether or not the proper volume of water was run is probably moot.
3. It is possible that knowledge of area soil characteristics, age of property, local building conditions and practices, might have served as a basis for caution or warning, regardless of whether or not dye was found at the surface. Such warnings are at the discretion of the inspector.

Questions In Determination of Adequacy of Septic Test Performed

1. Is there visual evidence in basement of the subject property that the laundry sink does not or might not drain to same location as main house sewer line? [Yes-arrangement of piping; height of exit of septic drain above sink]
2. Does client recall and can testify that dye was introduced only in drywell? How much water was run? Over what time? (125 g in 1/2hr is about 4.2 gpm which is possible from a reasonably strong flow at a single sink faucet. Typically 3-4 gpm for a kitchen sink, or single tub, depending on pump pressure switch settings, control valve settings, clogged piping, type of pump, etc.) What type of well and pump equipment are provided? Shallow well, deep well, submersible pump vs 2-line jet pump? At what pressure does the pump cut in and out, what type of holding tank is installed, what is the average water pressure in the house, what is the measured flow in gpm from the faucet used to perform the test? only. 125 gals in 1/2 hr is possible and reasonable, but a bit less than the usual volume of water run for septic tests.
3. Would a conventional and properly conducted test absolutely, probably, possibly have revealed a failed system?
• what conditions led to discovery of failure (number of occupants, level of usage, time until failure noted after initial occupancy)?
• exactly what equipment was discovered when the old system was excavated?
• can one reliably infer from what was discovered that question 3 is pertinent and that q3 can be answered?

Court Hearing Notes regarding inadequate septic testing complaint

1. Water was run into laundry drain, nowhere near and no visible connection to main house drain; photo details strongly suggest laundry drain does not or may not drain to septic - wrong place to test. No dye was used.
2. Septic report indicates dye was used etc - in boilerplate. Minimal info. provided by report
3. Home inspection report - a checklist form - completely blank plumbing section - suspect inspector was distracted by something and just forgot this topic - does not meet ASHI standards for plumbing inspection.
4. Septic failed immediately on occupancy - probably less than 200g water run.
5. Subsequent discovery on excavation indicates no functioning septic - sludged tank, no leach lines except. one pipe, completely root-filled. Strong possibility that a proper loading and dye test would have failed;

7/3/95 Note to File: arbitrator found for the plaintiff in full, holding that a proper septic loading and dye test had not been not performed and the protection contracted-for was not provided. Key in this case was that the plaintiff did not attempt to prove that a properly performed septic test would definitely have discovered the failed septic system, although given the totally impacted septic tank a proper test would almost certainly have done so. Rather the plaintiff argued that the contracted-for protection was not provided. In other words, the plaintiff was denied even the opportunity to possibly discover that the septic system had failed because the "septic test" performed by the inspector was completely incompetent.

SEPTPROB.TXT - Excerpt from DJ Friedman arbitration file

Septic Systems Online Book

The Septic Systems Online Book - Where Are We?

More expert information on this topic

More Information on Septic System Diagnosis, Maintenance, & Repair

• The Septic System Information Website home page for this topic
• Septic Systems Inspection, Testing, & Maintenance- online textbook. Detailed how to inspect, maintain, repair information
• The Home Buyer's Guide to Septic Systems
• Septic Tank Pumping Guide: When, Why, How to pump the septic tank
• Home & Outdoor Living Water Requirements
• Septic Tank Capacity vs Usage in Daily Gallons of Wastewater Flow, calculating required septic tank size, calculating septic tank volume from size measurements
• How Big Should the Leach Field Be? - table of soil percolation rate vs. field size
• Septic System Drainfield Absorption System Biomat Formation - what leads to drain field clogging and expensive drainfield repairs
• Table of Required Septic & Well Clearances: Distances Between Septic System & Wells, Streams, Trees, etc.


Pennsylvania State Fact Sheets relating to domestic wastewater treatment systems include

• Pennsylvania State Wastewater Treatment Fact Sheet SW-161, Septic System Failure: Diagnosis and Treatment
• Pennsylvania State Wastewater Treatment Fact Sheet SW-162, The Soil Media and the Percolation Test
• Pennsylvania State Wastewater Treatment Fact Sheet SW-l64, Mound Systems for Wastewater Treatment
• Pennsylvania State Wastewater Treatment Fact Sheet SW-165, Septic Tank-Soil Absorption Systems
• Document Sources used for this web page include but are not limited to: Agricultural Fact Sheet #SW-161 "Septic Tank Pumping," by Paul D. Robillard and Kelli S. Martin. Penn State College of Agriculture - Cooperative Extension, edited and annotated by Dan Friedman (Thanks: to Bob Mackey for proofreading the original source material.)

InspectAPedia ^TM Home & Site Map - Building Inspection, Diagnosis, & Repair, Environmental Inspection & Testing - Research Website

Home Inspection Construction Consulting Services & advice for home buyers

Contact Daniel Friedman for website content suggestions or for fee-paid consulting

	Enter your search termsSubmit search form
	Search This Website - InspectAPedia.com