InspectAPedia TM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| InspectAPedia Home |
| | Air Conditioning |
| | Electrical | | | Environment | | | Exteriors | | | Heating | | | Home Inspection |
| | Insulate Ventilate |
| | Interiors | | | Mold Inspect/Test |
| | Plumbing Water Septic |
| | Roofing | | | Structure | | | Contact Us |
|
The Nature of Vision Surprises in the Study of Vision Research on Vision Needs in Order to "See" Object is Present Light Reflects off Object Eye Recs Light Brain Interprets Inattentional Blindness = IB Change Blindness Kristin's Cards Demo IB Factors Affecting IB Improving Ability to "See" HOME &BUILDING INSPECTORS and INSPECTION METHODS Home Inspection Inspector Directory Electrical Inspection Safety Home Inspector Education Historic Homes, Home Improvement Costs, Research Home Inspection Company Franchises Home Inspection Report Guide Reports: Checklists vs Narrative Safety for Building Inspectors Septic Inspection Methods Septic Inspection Safety How to Become a Home Inspector More Information InspectAPedia TM Home & Site Map Air Conditioning InspectAPedia Bookstore Electrical Environment Exteriors Heating Home Inspection Insulate Ventilate Interiors Mold Inspect/Test Plumbing Water Septic Roofing Structure Accuracy & Bias Pledge Contact Us |
Most people believe that if our eyes are open, we are seeing. Cognitive scientists once thought our visual perception acted much like a videotape recorder. We know now that this is not the case. Perception studies are demonstrating how little people actually see when they are not paying attention.1. The purpose of this article is to improve the chances that an inspector, charged with the visual examination of any complex system such as a building, its mechanical systems, and its site, will find both the visually apparent and the visually present but more subtle clues which signal important costly repairs, unsafe conditions, or other targets of the inspection. "Inspection" as used here refers to a primarily-visual approach which may make limited use of special equipment such as moisture meters or electrical circuit polarity testers, but which does not involve demolition or similar "invasive" methods to evaluate the condition of a building or similar complex system and its subsystems such as building mechanicals. More in-depth, un-biased, expert information on these topics and on building defect inspection, diagnosis, & repair can be found at "More Information below. © 2007 Daniel Friedman, All Rights Reserved. New York State License # 16000005303 This article is a chapter in the author's "Developing your X-Ray Vision, A Promotion Theory for Forensic Observation of Residential Construction - Levels of Fear, and how to use them to find and report significant, hidden problems." See http://www.inspect-ny.com/vision/vision.htm - The Nature of Vision - inspecting complex systems (this article, online) and see http://www.inspect-ny.com/structure/x-ray.htm for the online version of "Developing your X-Ray Vision." As this is an ongoing study project these articles are updated periodically. Also see http://www.inspect-ny.com/vision/sinkholes.htm about sinkholes in Florida. Also see "The Home Inspection and Construction Information Website" www.inspect-ny.com for free in-depth research on building defect recognition and repair, including both physical defects on buildings and environmental concerns such as mold and allergens. Surprises in the Study of Vision and Inspection of Buildings or Other Complex SystemsStudy in a variety of fields (eye and brain, the psychology of error, the physics of light and optics, microscopy, and aerobiology) has led to some surprises and to recognition that forensic experts and inspectors should not be overconfident in their ability to "see" what they are looking "for." Even the ability to see what we are looking "at" is demonstrated to be incomplete. Research on Vision Can Inform InspectorsSeveral areas of research can inform forensic inspectors and may improve their performance Neurology and brain function, particularly with respect to "seeing" Physics and the study of light, particularly optical physics and the detection of objects, both macroscopically (by eye) and microscopically (by instrument) Psychology of seeing, or "not seeing," the psychology of errors - why we make mistakes or fail to recognize something important, and why we do not, indeed cannot, focus our attention so as to "see" everything that is in our visual field. I have not attempted to recap everything about these areas, but I will cite a few ideas they suggest and which pertain to the use of an inspection methodology employing techniques to improve recognition of subtle clues of hidden defects. What is needed in order to "see" any object or object-feature?Presence: Information or Object Must Be PresentThe object or feature must be present in the visual field of the observer so that all the observer needs to do is direct his or her eye there to be [potentially] able to see it. The size and other requisite aspects of the object or feature are discussed below. For purposes of this discussion we refer to normal sighted-human vision, unaided by special equipment such as microscopes or telescopes, though the observer may [indeed should] make use of corrective eyeglasses or contact lenses if their vision has been found in need of those aids. In my longer X-ray Vision article my view is that "clues" which suggest an otherwise "hidden" defect are in fact visual "features" of that very defect or condition and can so can be recognized. Light: Light Reflects From Object to EyeLight reflected from a surface towards the eye of an observer carries incomplete information about the object and can be distorted. In any case it will not contain all of even the surface information about the object due to limitations of illumination, optical distortion, and of course the inability to "see around corners." The human eye is sensitive to light (electromagnetic radiation) from around 350 to 750nm in wavelength. It is speculated that we evolved to be sensitive to radiation at these wavelengths because they are so common in sunlight. Some other animals have eyes which are sensitive to electromagnetic radiation at lower wavelengths (such as infra red). In the process of "inspecting" objects and systems in the field, inspectors use a combination of local natural light, artificial indoor lighting, and flashlights. The flashlight is a more important tool than some inspectors realize. the level or intensity of illumination, angle of illumination, and color of the light source can make the difference between a human's ability to "see" or not see a feature. The ultimate level of detection of visual features being illuminated by light is a function of the wavelength of the light source, since particles smaller than the wavelength may fail to refract or bend the light waves sufficiently to permit detection. In forensic microscopy the wavelength of the light source is a factor but more important is the ability of the microscope's lens system to direct light rays at the particle being examined. The particle refracts, or "bends" light rays, producing a visible image which is focused by the lens system. Eye: Light Reaches EyeThe eye, the cornea and lens of the eye itself is the image-forming system for human inspectors working without a microscope or binoculars. The image of the observed object is formed at the back of the eye on the retina where special cells in turn fire neurons which pass the visual image map to the visual cortex of the brain. The human eye can resolve particles down to a few hundredths of an inch or so in diameter. Brain: Brain Interprets InformationThe brain plays a considerable additional role in "seeing" beyond mere image mapping. Additional image data processing occurs in the brain in order to recognize what is being observed. What a human "sees" is a representation of the objective world built-up in the brain from a combination of sensory inputs and significant additional processing in the brain. While I'm taking some literary license to say so, it would appear most likely that the brain constructs the "image" in the observer's consciousness from a combination of visual inputs from the eye, a map of the eye's input in the visual cortex, and processing of that data along with stored maps of "expected images." As human brains are designed to "make sense" of various sensory inputs, we may do so even if "making sense" means "making it up." Thus our observations are vulnerable to illusion. Inattentional Blindness: Observer (Home Inspector) Must Pay Conscious Attention sIn addition to the need for an object to be observed, a light source, the observer's eye and brain to form an image, vision also requires a level of attention by the observer. The eye and brain are not a video camera faithfully recording all visual data towards which aimed. The inspector may fail to see objects even when they are present and readily apparent in the center of the visual field. Perhaps less difficult to grasp is research about forms of blindness or an inability to "see" - change blindness and inattentional blindness in particular. In the forming conscious visual information in the brain, inattentional blindness refers to an observer's blindness to the presence of an object right in the visual field, even though the observer is awake and directing her eyes directly towards it. Because "seeing" at a conscious level requires both the processing of visual signals from the eye and a processing of the input by the brain to form an "image," research has demonstrated that conscious "attention" is absolutely required to "see" anything. In other words, a person can be "looking" right at something, but if his attention is not focused there as well, he will not see it. Perhaps not at all. [1] The observer is likely to fail to see something significant, even in the center of the visual field, if s/he is not looking for that particular thing - if it's not in the observer's "attention set." Inspector learn quickly the importance of a comprehensive visual scan of everything. An inspector won't "inspect" a room by only looking at one wall. But now we understand that merely directing the eyes at every surface may be quite insufficient. What's tricky about this is that the inspector believes s/he has "looked-at" a surface, but may not have "attended" to it. Change BlindnessResearchers in this area describes "change blindness" - the inability to "see" a component change between two rapid presentations of an image, and "inattention blindness [IB]which describes an inability to register and use visual information if attention is not properly focused. "Inattention blindness" is most pertinent to inspectors and recalls earlier work on the psychology of errors, and capture errors. Kristin's Cards: A Demonstration of Inattentional BlindnessThe ease with which IB occurs is nicely demonstrated by Kristin's Cards at http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~cater/PhD/Magic/cardtrick.html . I will leave the explanation of the viewer's inability to "see" something important to Kristen. Factors Affecting Inattentional Blindness"Seeing" involves conscious mental effort and focus, a task from which observers can be distracted or which can fail due to IB. Four factors affect inattentional blindness: conspicuity [both sensory and cognitive], mental workload [too much or too little], expectation [attention set], and capacity. [Reference 5] An inspector is more likely to see what s/he is looking for, and outside of that set, to see that which is familiar or large. Home inspectors are not "seeing" everything that is present, even when it's right in the center of their field of view. An inspector is less likely to see something that s/he is not expecting, even if it is important and visually distinct by characteristics such as shape, color, or motion. An inspector's "attention set" of expectations filters out other stimuli. An inspector is less likely to "see" a defect in a structure or system being examined if s/he does not already have an in-depth and visceral understanding of the construction and operation of the structure or system, leading to a broad and deep "attention set." Improving Vision: Tuning Up Your Ability to See During an Inspection
More Information on Building Diagnostic Inspections and RepairsReferences: Vision, Seeing, and Inattentional Blindness "A Neurobiologist's Notebook: The Mind's Eye, what the blind see," Oliver Sacks, New Yorker Magazine, July 28, 2003 p. 46-59 [Three different responses to "blindness," increased-detailed visual mapping in some "blind" individuals, synthesia] "An Overview and Some Applications of Inattentional Blindness Research," Todd A. Ward, http://hubel.sfasu.edu/courseinfo/SL03/inattentional_blindness.htm Austin State University "Inattentional Blindness Versus Inattentional Amnesia for Fixated but Ignored Words," Geraint Rees, Charlotte Russell, Christopher D. Frith, Jon Drier, Science, 24 December 1999 www.sciencemag.org "Inattentional Blindness, An Overview," Arian Mack & Irvin Rock, http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v5/psyche-5-03-mack.html "Inattentional Blindness" & Conspicuity," Mark Green, http://www.visualexpert.com/Resources/inattentionalblindness.html "Seeing Reasons," Jennifer Church, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, ACLS Project Proposal, 2003. "When Good Observers Go Bad: Change Blindness, Inattentional Blindness,
and Visual Experience," http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00001050/�� - abstract Eye and Brain, the Psychology of Seeing, Richard L. Gregory, 5th Ed, Princeton University Press 1997, ISBN 0-691-04837-1 (See Ch. 8, "Learning how to see") Inattentional Blindness, Arien Mack and Irvin Rock, MIT Press, 2000 ISBN 0-262-13339-3 Light, Michael I. Sobel, University of Chicago Press 1987, ISBN 0-226-76751-5 The Astonishing Hypothesis, the Scientific Search for the Soul, Francis Crick, Touchstone, Simon & Schuster 1994, ISBN 0-684-80158-2 (See Chapter 4, "The Psychology of Vision", 14 "Visual Awareness") The Nature of Visual Illusion, Mark Fineman, Dover Publications 1996 (original 1981), ISBN 0-486-29105-7 The Quest for Consciousness, a Neurobiological Approach, Christof Koch, Roberts & Co. 2004, ISBN 0-9747077-8-0 (exploration of seeing, visual processes, consciousness) Visual Cognition Lab video demos and stimuli at http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/djs_lab/demos.html [1] Ward points out [Reference 2] that "Most people believe that if our eyes are open, we are seeing. Cognitive scientists once thought � our visual perception acted much like a videotape recorder�. We know now that this is not the case. � perception studies are demonstrating how little people actually see when they are not paying attention�. Inattentional blindness refers to �a situation in which a stimulus that is not attended is not perceived, even though a person is looking directly at it'. � Mack and Rock found that �a puzzling and surprising aspect of all the experiments examining the perception of a small number of critical stimuli under conditions of inattention was that, on average, 25% of the observers failed to detect their presence"" leading to a paradox that "in order to see something with any detail in the environment, observers must first direct their attention towards an object. However if something is not yet perceived, how can observers direct their attention towards it?" Part of the answer lies in the observation that we perceive more than we notice. Driving is an example. So we do perceive environmental stimuli outside of our awareness. The paradox falls apart when one distinguishes between conscious, attended stimuli and unconscious, unattended stimuli. What characteristics determine which environmental stimuli are attended and thus consciously perceived? Conspicuity. "Blindness" to visual stimuli may occur, then because they lack conspicuity. But such blindness can also occur when the observer is focusing on something else, (distraction or a capture error) even though the stimuli are right there in the center of his/her field of vision! Such blindness can also occur from too little mental activity, such as performing a task by rote. An observer can be blind to even conspicuous stimuli if s/he is not expecting it. Navy pilots in training failed to see a large airplane set on the carrier deck in the landing zone just before touchdown. "When an observer has an attentional set for an object or for certain characteristics of objects, only things in the attentional set will capture their attention when presented in the perceptual field." Similarly, observers were more likely to notice an unexpected object if it was more similar to the stimuli they were currently attending. More expert information on this topic |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| InspectAPedia Home |
| | Air Conditioning |
| | Electrical | | | Environment | | | Exteriors | | | Heating | | | Home Inspection |
| | Insulate Ventilate |
| | Interiors | | | Mold Inspect/Test |
| | Plumbing
Water Septic |
| | Roofing | | | Structure | | | Contact Us |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
...
More Information InspectAPedia TM Home & Site Map Air Conditioning InspectAPedia Bookstore Electrical Environment Exteriors Heating Home Inspection Insulate Ventilate Interiors Mold Inspect/Test Plumbing Water Septic Roofing Structure Accuracy & Bias Pledge Contact Us |
More Information on Building Diagnostic Inspections and Repairs
|
05/19/2007 www.inspect-ny.com/vision/vision.htm © Copyright 2008 2004 Daniel Friedman - all rights reserved